Rhetorical Strategies in Zakir Naik’s Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach

  • Ahmad Rizal Abdullah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Fitriansal Fitriansal Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ashar Pramono Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Keywords: rhetoric, Aristotle, Zakir Naik, persuasive speech, ethos, phatos, logos, descriptive qualitative methode

Abstract

This study explores the rhetorical strategies employed by Dr. Zakir Naik in one of his public speeches, focusing on how persuasion is constructed through Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. Using a descriptive qualitative method, the research analyzes a selected speech transcript to uncover how language and argumentation are strategically used to influence audiences in a religious and intercultural context. Drawing on Aristotle's classical rhetorical theory as the main analytical framework, the study identifies how Dr. Naik establishes credibility (ethos), appeals to emotion (pathos), and constructs logical reasoning (logos) to strengthen his message. The analysis reveals that Dr. Naik effectively blends these rhetorical elements to assert religious authority, counter opposing viewpoints, and engage audiences from diverse backgrounds. This study contributes to the understanding of rhetorical discourse in contemporary religious communication and provides insight into how language can be used as a powerful tool for persuasion in cross-cultural settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, S., & Shah, F. (2018). Islamic identity in Zakir Naik’s speeches: A discourse analysis. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 6(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.11634/233100361806945
Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 4th century BCE)
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Rahman, A., & Hafeez, R. (2020). Media representation and interfaith dialogue in Zakir Naik’s public lectures. Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication Studies, 9(2), 88–103.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
Yusof, N. A., & Zaini, A. (2021). Audience reception of Dr. Zakir Naik’s debates: A sociolinguistic perspective. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(4), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKM-2021-3704-08
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
Published
2025-06-12
How to Cite
Ahmad Rizal Abdullah, Fitriansal, F., & Pramono, A. (2025). Rhetorical Strategies in Zakir Naik’s Speech: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(2), 1129-1136. Retrieved from https://dmi-journals.org/deiktis/article/view/1660
Section
Articles