An Error Analysis of DeepL Translation in Children’s Literature: A Case Study of Dolly and Her Little Red Umbrella

  • Achmad Lutfi Universitas LIA, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ika Kartika Amilia Universitas LIA, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: translation, DeepL Translator, children's literature, machine translation error taxonomy

Abstract

This study aims to examine how effective is the DeepL Language Translator when translating the story Dolly and Her Little Red Umbrella from English into Indonesian language. Error analysis was conducted on the translation using the taxonomy of machine translation errors by Costa et al. (2015). A total of 36 errors were detected during the analysis and these errors were classified into four categories namely semantic, syntactic, lexical and pragmatic errors with the frequency of occurrence of 5, 1, 5 and 23 respectively. The most common type of error was pragmatic, highlighting challenges in conveying the cultural and contextual aspects of language in children’s literature. These issues often stem from DeepL's difficulty in capturing subtle meanings, idioms, and unspoken cues that are crucial for accurate translation. The findings suggest that while DeepL demonstrates strong grammatical accuracy, improvements are needed in understanding and conveying contextual subtleties and cultural references. To enhance translation quality, future advancements should focus on refining context comprehension, incorporating feedback from language experts, and leveraging sophisticated machine learning techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkatheery, E. R. (2023). Google translate errors in legal texts: Machine translation quality assessment. AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, 7(1), 208–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol7no1.16

Almahasees, Z. M. (2018). Assessment of Google and Microsoft Bing Translation of Journalistic Texts. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 4(3), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2018.4.3.178

Amilia, I. K., & Hasni, R. A. (2023). Investigating subtitle error typologies in unofficial movie streaming website by using FAR model. Annual International Conference on Language, Literature, and Media, 5, 138–148.

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (n.d.). KBBI VI daring. Retrieved from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id

Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Cambridge dictionary. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org

Costa, Â., Ling, W., Luís, T., Correia, R., & Coheur, L. (2015). A linguistically motivated taxonomy for Machine Translation error analysis. Machine Translation, 29(2), 127-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-015-9169-0

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewi, N. L. P. V., Mardjohan, A., & Santosa, M. H. (2016). The naturalness of translation in translating short story entitled “Drupadi” from Indonesian into English. Lingua Scientia, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/ls.v23i1.16064

Karimova, U. (2025). HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSLATION PRACTICES: A CHRONOLOGICAL AND ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 5(9), 1164-1168. https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai/article/view/6628

Krippendorff, K. H. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Larson, M. L. (1998). Meaning-based translation: A guide to cross-language equivalence. Bloomsbury Academic.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Munday, J., Pinto, S. R., & Blakesley, J. (2022). Introducing translation studies: Theories and applications (5th ed.). Routledge.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice-Hall International.

O’Hagan, M. (2019). The impact of new technologies on translation studies: A technological turn. In M. O’Hagan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of translation and technology. Routledge.

Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Oxford learner’s dictionaries. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com

Popović, M. (2018). Error Classification and Analysis for Machine Translation Quality Assessment. In: Moorkens, J., Castilho, S., Gaspari, F., Doherty, S. (eds) Translation Quality Assessment. Machine Translation: Technologies and Applications, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91241-7_7

Rojo, J. L. (2018). Aspects of human translation: The current situation and an emerging trend. Hermēneus: Revista de Traducción e Interpretación, 20, 257–294. https://doi.org/10.24197/her.20.2018.257-294

Toral, A., & Way, A. (2018). What level of quality can neural machine translation attain on literary text? arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04962

Trends and Insights in Translation Studies:A Scientometric analysis from 2020-2024. (2025). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.52152/800132

Wang, H., Wu, H., He, Z., Huang, L., & Church, K. W. (2022). Progress in machine translation. Engineering, 18, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.023

Published
2026-06-22
How to Cite
Lutfi, A., & Amilia, I. K. (2026). An Error Analysis of DeepL Translation in Children’s Literature: A Case Study of Dolly and Her Little Red Umbrella. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(2), 2661-2670. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3243
Section
Articles