Semantic Shift in Social Media X Discourse: A Corpus-Based Study of Viral Terminology

  • Muhammad Natsir Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Michelle F. N. Tobing Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Bunga Anjelika Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Tsurayya Nailah A. P. Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Jessica Geraldine Sibagariang Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: semantic shift, X (Twitter) discourse, digital pragmatics, viral terminology, thematic analysis, identity

Abstract

The rapid development of social media has accelerated the dynamics of semantic shift in digital linguistic practices, positioning language not merely as a tool for communication but also as a space for negotiating emotions, identity, and social values. The use of viral terminology on platform X (Twitter) demonstrates that lexical meanings undergo transformation reflecting shifts in collective consciousness, particularly in relation to mental health, workplace relations, and urban lifestyles. This study aims to examine how such semantic shifts are constructed and negotiated within the Indonesian digital social context. Employing a qualitative approach with a digital case study design, data were collected through non-participatory observation of public posts containing selected viral terms over the past two years, accompanied by documentation of usage contexts and collocational patterns. The analysis adopted a reflexive thematic approach to identify recurring meaning patterns within the discourse. The findings reveal three primary dynamics: viral terms functioning as a medium of emotional catharsis, dialogic negotiation of meaning within digital public spaces, and collocational shifts contributing to the formation of new identities and value orientations. These findings affirm that semantic shift in social media discourse is affective, interactional, and ideological in nature. Theoretically, this study enriches the integration of usage-based approaches and discursive pragmatics, while practically contributing to digital literacy development, critical language curriculum design, and the understanding of contemporary digital generational dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press.

Androutsopoulos, J. (2021). Digital discourse and the dynamics of recontextualization. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.002

Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Routledge.

Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2023). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Blank, A., & Koch, P. (1999). Historical semantics and cognition. In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 1–49). Mouton de Gruyter.

Du Bois, J. W. (2021). The stance triangle. Discourse Studies, 23(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456211035809

Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press.

Geeraerts, D. (2020). Semantic change as a socially situated cognitive process. Cognitive Linguistics, 31(4), 649–673. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0045

Gries, S. T., & Divjak, D. (2021). Frequency effects in language. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030528

Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2016). Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1489–1501. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1141

Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge University Press.

Hilpert, M., & Gries, S. T. (2022). Assessing semantic change through collostructional analysis. Corpora, 17(2), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0254

Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kutuzov, A., Øvrelid, L., Szymanski, T., & Velldal, E. (2020). Diachronic word embeddings and semantic shifts: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 46(2), 381–415. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00380

Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). John Benjamins.

Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2021). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) (2nd ed.). John Benjamins.

Sari, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Semantic prosody in Indonesian social media discourse. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46521

Tagliamonte, S. (2016). So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet. Cambridge University Press.

Traugott, E. C. (2010). Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 29–70). De Gruyter Mouton.

Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press.

Winter, B., Thompson, G., & Urban, M. (2020). Semantic change and frequency effects in digital corpora. Journal of Language Evolution, 5(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzaa012

Zappavigna, M. (2022). Ambient affiliation and social bonding in digital discourse. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077045

Published
2026-04-23
How to Cite
Natsir, M., Tobing, M. F. N., Anjelika, B., Nailah A. P., T., & Sibagariang, J. G. (2026). Semantic Shift in Social Media X Discourse: A Corpus-Based Study of Viral Terminology. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(2), 1309-1318. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i2.3291
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)