Meaning, Symbols and Functions of Ulos Ragi Hotang of Toba Batak Ethnicity: Hypersemiotic Study

  • Selly Magdalena Saragih Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Jekmen Sinulingga Sinulingga Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Indah Sari Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Lusiani Sitorus Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Sarido Natalia Manullang Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Sandro Parningotan Butar-butar Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Ulos Ragi Hotang, Toba Batak, hypersemiotics, cultural symbol

Abstract

This study discusses the meaning, symbols, and functions of UlosRagiHotang in Batak Toba culture through a hypersemiotic approach. UlosRagiHotang is one of the traditional Batak Toba cloths that has philosophical, social, and spiritual values ​​in people's lives. The development of digital media and popular culture has caused the ulos symbol to undergo a transformation in meaning so that it is not only understood as a traditional cloth, but also as a representation of the visual identity of Batak culture. This study aims to describe the symbolic meaning of UlosRagiHotang, explain its socio-cultural functions, and reveal changes in the symbolic meaning of ulos in modern society. The study uses a descriptive qualitative method with a hypersemiotic approach by Yasraf Amir Piliang. Research data were obtained through observation, literature study, and documentation of the use of UlosRagiHotang in traditional ceremonies and digital media. The results show that UlosRagiHotang has symbolic meanings related to family ties, respect, prayer, and hopes for a harmonious life. Ulos also functions as a medium of cultural communication in the Dalihanna tolu system of the Batak Toba people. From a hypersemiotic perspective, the UlosRagiHotang symbol has undergone an expansion of meaning due to visual reproduction through social media, the fashion industry, and popular culture, creating a cultural hyperreality. Nevertheless, the Toba Batak people maintain the philosophical value and traditional function of ulos through the inheritance of traditions, the implementation of traditional rituals, and the strengthening of local cultural identity. This research confirms that UlosRagiHotang remains a symbol of Toba Batak culture that adapts to changing times without losing its philosophical value in modern contemporary society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustianto, A. (2011). Makna simbol dalam kebudayaan manusia. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 8(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.31849/jib.v8i1.1234

Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. Fontana Press. https://monoskop.org/images/b/b9/Barthes_Roland_Image_Music_Text.pdf

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904

Bungin, B. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif. Kencana.

Desiani, I. F. (2022). Simbol dalam kain ulos pada suku Batak Toba. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 18(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.31849/jib.v18i2.9466

Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books. https://monoskop.org/images/5/54/Geertz_Clifford_The_Interpretation_of_Cultures_Selected_Essays.pdf

Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.

Hariati, P., & Purwarno, P. (2024). The symbolic representation of ulos in Batak culture: An ecolinguistic perspective. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(3), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i3.10261

Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Rineka Cipta.

Manik, N. M., & Damanik, R. (2023). The meaning of the functions and motives of the Toba Batak ethnic Ragidup ulos: A semiotic study. Journal of Language Development and Linguistics, 2(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.55927/jldl.v2i1.2817

Marpaung, J. V., & Nur, S. M. (2019). Pemodelan estetika motif Ulos Ragi Hotang Batak Toba sebagai aplikasi media dekoratif. Jurnal Rekarupa, 7(2), 88–96.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill. https://archive.org/details/understandingmed00mclu

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Rev. ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pane, A. M. C., & Irawan, I. (2025). Perbedaan struktur, fungsi, dan makna simbolik Ulos Ragi Hotang pada pria dan wanita dalam upacara pernikahan adat Batak Toba. Ezra Science Bulletin, 3(2), 2090–2095. https://doi.org/10.58526/ezrasciencebulletin.v3i2.467

Piliang, Y. A. (2019). Hipersemiotika: Tafsir cultural studies atas matinya makna. Cantrik Pustaka.

Rusting, W., & Sinaga, A. S. G. (2023). Semiotika ulos hela dan mandar hela dalam adat pernikahan Batak Toba di Kecamatan Sumbul Pegagan. Jurnal Basataka, 6(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v6i1.207

Sinaga, P. S., Djunaidi, B., & Diani, I. (2021). Semiotika umpasa bahasa Batak Toba: Pendekatan Roland Barthes. Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus, 5(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v5i1.12600

Sinulingga, J., Tampubolon, R. B., & Siahaan, P. (2024). Motif Ulos Ragi Hotang etnik Batak Toba: Kajian semiotik sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 24005–24015. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/15681

Published
2026-07-23
How to Cite
Saragih, S. M., Sinulingga, J. S., Sari, I., Sitorus, L., Manullang, S. N., & Butar-butar, S. P. (2026). Meaning, Symbols and Functions of Ulos Ragi Hotang of Toba Batak Ethnicity: Hypersemiotic Study. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(3), 3193-3203. https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v6i3.3814
Section
Articles