Pengaruh Dimensi Budaya terhadap Implementasi Refleksi Kolektif dalam Perspektif Collectivism dan High-Power Distance
Abstract
Artikel ini membahas dua isu utama yaitu efek dimensi budaya (kolektivisme dan high-power distance) pada implementasi refleksi kolektif dan alternatif untuk memoderasi efek buruk budaya pada realisasi refleksi kolektif. Hasil investigasi literatur pada artikel ini mengungkapkan bahwa kolektivisme dan high-power distance memberikan dampak positif dan negatif terhadap realisasi refleksi kolektif. Kolektivisme berkontribusi menciptakan suasana dengan dorongan emosional yang kuat di kalangan guru. Namun, kolektivisme secara negatif berkontribusi pada keengganan untuk berkomentar dan dikomentari karena adanya rasa tanggung jawab untuk mencegah konflik. Kondisi ini dapat menyebabkan kurangnya kekritisan dan menghambat perubahan. Sehubungan dengan efek hig-power distance, terungkap bahwa refleksi kolektif dipengaruhi secara negatif. Serupa dengan efek negatif yang dihasilkan dari internalisasi kolektivisme, high-power distance juga mendorong keragu-raguan dalam berkomentar dan dikomentari. Selain itu, juga menimbulkan ketergantungan pada ahlinya, kurangnya kreativitas, dan kurangnya keinginan lebih. Untuk mengurangi efek negatif dari dimensi budaya, beberapa alternatif disarankan dalam artikel ini, yaitu mempertahankan Lesson Study (LS) dan Action Education (EA), secara eksplisit mengundang guru pemula untuk terlibat dalam tahap refleksi, dan mempromosikan refleksi yang berorientasi pada makna.
Downloads
References
Arani, M. R. S., Keisuke, F., & Lassegard, J. P. (2010). "Lesson Study" as Professional Culture in Japanese Schools: An Historical Perspective on Elementary Classroom Practices. 171-200.
Cheung, W. S., & Wong, J. L. N. (2017). Understanding reflection for teacher change in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(7), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2016-0007.
Ebaeguin, M., & Stephens, M. (2014). Cultural challenges in adapting lesson study to a Philippines setting. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), n1.
Fischer, R., & Mansell, A. (2009). Commitment across cultures: A meta-analytical approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1339-1358. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.14.
Gu, L., & Wang, J. (2006). School-based research and professional learning: An innovative model to promote teacher professional development in China. Teaching Education, 17(1), 59-73.
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (Fifth ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2014). Promoting core reflection in teacher education: Deepening professional growth., Advances in Research on Teaching, 22(11), pp. 73–89).
Kuswandono, P. (2014). University mentors' views on reflective practice in microteaching: building trust and genuine feedback. Reflective Practice, 15(6), 701.
Marzuki, A. A. (2013). Reflecting the reflective journal training in South Sulawesi, Indonessia: The case of secondary teachers from Bugis ethnic group. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, Adelaide.
McNeil, K. L. (2016). Work group trust: Differences between individualist and collectivist cultures. In Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict. Proceedings, 21(11), pp. 40-45.
Ohlsson, J. (2013). Team learning: collective reflection processes in teacher teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(5), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-Feb-2012-0011.
Saito, E., Hawe, P., Hadiprawiroc, S., & Empedhe, S. (2008). Initiating education reform through lesson study at a university in Indonesia. Educational Action Research, 16(3), 391-406. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650790802260372.
Suratno, T. (2012). Lesson study in Indonesia: an Indonesia University of Education experience. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(3), 196-215. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/20468251211256410.
Suratno, T., & Iskandar, S. (2010). Teacher reflection in Indonesia: Lessons learnt from a lesson study program. US-China Education Review, 7(12), 39-48.
Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality, 69(1), 907–924.
Wanda, D. (2015). The development of a clinical reflective practice model for paediatric nursing students in Indonesia using an action research approach. (Doctor’s Unpublished Thesis), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney.
Wu, J., & Wu, Y. (2014). A research of college English reflective teaching in China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), pp. 2366-2372. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.11.2366-2372.
Yanuarti, E., & Treagust, D. F. (2016). Reflcetive teaching practice: Teachers’ perspective in an Indonesian context. Paper presented at the International Conference on Sociology Education, Bandung.
Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2015). Effects of cultural power distance on group creativity and individual group member creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 990.
Zhan, Y., & Wan, Z. H. (2016). Appreciated but constrained: Reflective practice of student teachers in learning communities in a Confucian heritage culture. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 669-685.
Zhao, M. (2012). Teachers’ professional development from the perspective of teaching reflection levels. Chinese Education & Society, 45(4), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450404.
Copyright (c) 2023 Nur Insan Tangkelangi , Hafirah Patang, Rahmawati Upa'
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
License
The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User/Public Rights
Under the Creative Commons license, users are allowed to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. The journal will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. The journal will only communicate with the corresponding author.
Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that the journal entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
Miscellaneous
The article will be published in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. The editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
