Can Subject Speak?

Keywords: subject, object, actant

Abstract

Why we ask the wrong questions and why we engage in circular reasoning in our debate on subjectivity are the questions I attempt to answer. By applying Greimasian narrative semiotics, I analyze the deep structure of subjectivity and apply the structure to trace the complex layers of subjectivity on which the postcolonial and postmodern critiques are founded. I argue that central to subjectivity is value, and the problem of subjectivity is not to define it but to locate power and desire that constitute the value. They are located in the triangle relationship between subject, object, and sender. The subject desires an object only when the sender creates value for the object. Problematizing and critiquing the position of the subject in the oppressive narrative, or asking who owns the narrative, are the gates to the labyrinth of irrelevant inquiries into subjectivity. This is the underlying reason for the failure of postmodern and postcolonial interventions, for they provide no solution to the ongoing oppression of marginal subjects. Agency and freedom are only myths constituted by the postmodern and postcolonial narratives. The subject is scandalous. It does not exist in its own narrative. The subject never speaks for itself. It is condemned to self-alienation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Althusser, Louis. 2014. “Ideology and Ideologial State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” in Critical theory: A Reader, edited by D. Tallack. Routledge.

Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. Fontana Press.

Benveniste, Emile. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, Fla: University of Miami Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.

Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.

Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

Derrida, Jacques. 2016. Of Grammatology. JHU Press.

Descartes, René. 2008. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. OUP Oxford.

Greimas, A. J. 1971. “Narrative Grammar: Units and Levels.” MLN 86(6):793–806.

Greimas, A. J., J. Courtès, and Michael Rengstorf. 1976. “The Cognitive Dimension of Narrative Discourse.” New Literary History 7(3):433–47. doi: 10.2307/468554.

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1982. Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1983. Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1993. The Semiotics of Passions: From States of Affairs to States of Feeling. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Greimas, Algirdas Julien, Frank Collins, and Paul Perron. 1989. “The Veridiction Contract.” New Literary History 20(3):651–60. doi: 10.2307/469359.

Greimas, Algirdas Julien, Paul Perron, and Frank Collins. 1989. “On Meaning.” New Literary History 20(3):539–50. doi: 10.2307/469352.

Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Écrits: A Selection. New York: Norton.

Lee, Mi-Kyoung. 2005. Epistemology after Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Oxford University Press.

Mahon, Michael. 1992. Foucault’s Nietzschean Genealogy: Truth, Power, and the Subject. Suny Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.

Norton, David Fate, and Mary J. Norton. 2007. David Hume: A Treatise of Human Nature: Volume 1: Texts. OUP Oxford.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2023. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Pp. 171–219 in Imperialism. Routledge.

Sverdiolas, Arūnas. 2019. “Algirdas J. Greimas’s Egology.” Actes Sémiotiques 122.

Published
2025-08-30
How to Cite
Thamrin, U., & Ridwan, R. (2025). Can Subject Speak? . DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(3), 2501-2514. Retrieved from https://dmi-journals.org/deiktis/article/view/2060
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>